CVE Tools

CVE-2026-48558

SimpleHelp Authentication Bypass via Missing OIDC JWT Signature Verification

Exploited in the wild. In CISA KEV since 2026‑06‑29. Fixed versions are out.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • SimpleHelpAffected: ≥ 5.5.0, < 5.5.16Upgrade to: 5.5.16Affected: ≥ 6.0, < 6.0 RC2Upgrade to: 6.0 RC2Stated by: CVE record
  • Simple-help SimplehelpAffected: < 5.5.16Upgrade to: 5.5.16Stated by: NVD

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check your installed SimpleHelp version and confirm whether you are running SimpleHelp 5.5.15 or earlier, or a 6.0 pre-release.
  2. If you are on an affected version, plan an immediate upgrade to the fixed release (SimpleHelp fixed in 5.5.16, or 6.0 RC2).
  3. After upgrading, verify your OIDC login configuration still functions normally for technicians and that unauthorized login attempts are no longer possible.
  4. If upgrading right away is blocked, restrict network access to SimpleHelp (only allow trusted admin networks/IPs) and review for signs of compromise while you prepare the upgrade.

Coverage timeline

7 publishers
  1. Advisory coverage

    ·Help Net Security summary
  2. Cisco Talos highlights research on ARToken phishing-as-a-service platform. A password-spraying campaign targeting Microsoft 365 generated 81M login attempts. A critical authentication bypass in SimpleHelp RMM software is exploited for malwa

    ·Cisco Talos summary
  3. Added to CISA KEV catalog

    ·CISA KEV
  4. SimpleHelp fixed CVE-2026-48558, where unauthenticated attackers could create privileged Technician accounts via OIDC without MFA, with Shodan-exposed servers observed but no confirmed exploitation.

    ·BleepingComputer

Sourced from public security reporting — each date is when it was published, not when it happened. 1 further article named this CVE in wider roundups without reporting it as a distinct event.

What it is

From the CVE record

SimpleHelp versions 5.5.15 and prior and 6.0 pre-release versions contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in the OIDC authentication flow. When OIDC authentication is configured, identity tokens submitted during login are accepted without verifying their cryptographic signature. In a vulnerable configuration, a remote, unauthenticated attacker can submit a forged token containing arbitrary identity claims to obtain a fully authenticated technician session. In some configurations, this may also allow bypass of multi-factor authentication. No user interaction is required.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

SimpleHelp (RMM) versions 5.5.15 and earlier (and 6.0 pre-releases) can be tricked into treating fake login tokens as real, letting an attacker get fully logged-in technician access—so yes, a typical small business using SimpleHelp should act now.

CVE-2026-48558 is an authentication bypass in SimpleHelp’s OIDC login flow where identity tokens are accepted without verifying their JWT signature, enabling remote unauthenticated attackers to forge tokens and obtain fully authenticated technician sessions (and in some cases bypass MFA).

If you're affected

  • Full technician access takeover
  • Malware delivery via compromised RMM
  • Credential theft from endpoints
  • Complete service disruption

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS93rd
CISA KEV
CISA KEV

Listed as exploited in the wild since 2026-06-29.

US federal agencies must remediate by 2026-07-02.

Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

5.7% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 93rd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

21 events over 117 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. EPSS band changehigh → low
  3. EPSS band changehigh → low
  4. EPSS band changehigh → low
  5. EPSS band changehigh → 0epss band change
  6. EPSS band changemoderate → high

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 10.0 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

References in the record

And 2 more references. See all after sign-in

Analysis on the cve.tools blog

In the news

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next exploited one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for SimpleHelp, not every advisory. This one: actively exploited.