CVE Tools
Track your stack

CVE-2023-40583

libp2p nodes vulnerable to OOM attack

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 61st percentile. Fixed in 0.27.4.

CVSS 3.17.5HighEPSS percentile61st1.0% chance in 30 daysCISA KEVNot listedNo confirmed exploitation
No public exploit knownFix0.27.4Upgrade to this build

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD, GitHub

NVD CVE.org

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • Libp2p Go-libp2pAffected: < 0.27.4Upgrade to: not statedStated by: CVE record
  • Go github.com/libp2p/go-libp2pAffected: < 0.27.4Upgrade to: 0.27.4Stated by: GitHub advisory
  • Protocol Libp2pAffected: < 0.27.4Upgrade to: 0.27.4Stated by: NVD

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

Is your organisation exposed?Request an assessment to establish which checks fit your systems.

What it is

From the CVE record

libp2p is a networking stack and library modularized out of The IPFS Project, and bundled separately for other tools to use. In go-libp2p, by using signed peer records a malicious actor can store an arbitrary amount of data in a remote node’s memory. This memory does not get garbage collected and so the victim can run out of memory and crash. If users of go-libp2p in production are not monitoring memory consumption over time, it could be a silent attack i.e. the attacker could bring down nodes over a period of time (how long depends on the node resources i.e. a go-libp2p node on a virtual server with 4 gb of memory takes about 90 sec to bring down; on a larger server, it might take a bit longer.) This issue was patched in version 0.27.4.

In plain language

No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS61st
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

1.0% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 61st percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

5 events over 454 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS 3.1 vector

Open in the CVSS calculator

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Scored 7.5 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality NoneNo confidentiality impact
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

References in the record

And 3 more references. See all after sign-in

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Libp2p, not every advisory.