CVE-2026-98379
netfilter: ip6t_rpfilter: reject routes without inet6_dev
No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 5th percentile. Fixed versions are out.
What to do
Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.
- LinuxAffected: ≥ e26f9a480fb6c1b614660e824d69a74e2ce990f3, < f4de78756b0fddbd125b2b1b77c74f2eccc8e977Upgrade to: f4de78756b0fddbd125b2b1b77c74f2eccc8e977Affected: ≥ e26f9a480fb6c1b614660e824d69a74e2ce990f3, < 1681ab6dd1271f2f36047490793b78b1848bbcc9Upgrade to: 1681ab6dd1271f2f36047490793b78b1848bbcc9Affected: ≥ e26f9a480fb6c1b614660e824d69a74e2ce990f3, < 65487e9e99431ffcf05024a817f51ee4e3bd9b47Upgrade to: 65487e9e99431ffcf05024a817f51ee4e3bd9b47Affected: ≥ e26f9a480fb6c1b614660e824d69a74e2ce990f3, < f49da48bd679cfee646d6a40dd02b1933de577d1Upgrade to: f49da48bd679cfee646d6a40dd02b1933de577d1 + 4 more branchesStated by: CVE record
Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in
What it is
From the CVE record
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ip6t_rpfilter: reject routes without inet6_dev ip6_route_lookup() can return an error-free route whose rt6i_idev is NULL. Lowering an external nexthop device's MTU below IPV6_MIN_MTU tears down its inet6_dev while fib6_ifdown() leaves routes using nexthop objects in the FIB. An unprivileged user can construct this state with rtnetlink in a private user and network namespace, then trigger a NULL dereference through an IPv6 rpfilter lookup: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000 KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] RIP: rpfilter_mt (net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_rpfilter.c:75) Call Trace: ip6t_do_table (net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c:316) nf_hook_slow (net/netfilter/core.c:619) ipv6_rcv (net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:351) __netif_receive_skb_one_core (net/core/dev.c:6216) process_backlog (net/core/dev.c:6680) __napi_poll (net/core/dev.c:7739) net_rx_action (net/core/dev.c:7959) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:622) do_softirq.part.0 (kernel/softirq.c:523) __local_bh_enable_ip (kernel/softirq.c:450) __dev_queue_xmit (net/core/dev.c:4913) packet_sendmsg (net/packet/af_packet.c:3139) __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2252) __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2259) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121) Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt Reject routes without an inet6_dev immediately after lookup. Such routes are not eligible for reverse-path filtering, and the check protects all later rt6i_idev dereferences.
In plain language
No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.
Exploitation
Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.
- CISA KEV
Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.
- Public exploits
No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.
- EPSS
0.2% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 5th percentile of scored CVEs.
Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.
Lifecycle
2 events over 0 days, from the signal feeds we watch.
- Publishedrecord updated
Affected products
Sources
References in the record
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/f4de78756b0fddbd125b2b1b77c74f2eccc8e977
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/1681ab6dd1271f2f36047490793b78b1848bbcc9
- git.kernel.org/stable/c/65487e9e99431ffcf05024a817f51ee4e3bd9b47
And 5 more references. See all after sign-in
In the news
Watch the software you run.
My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.
We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Linux, not every advisory.
A free account adds
- The full version matrix and every affected product
- Exploit links, proofs of concept and Metasploit modules
- Email alerts for the products you watch
- The same data over REST API, MCP and CLI