CVE Tools

CVE-2026-98341

wifi: cfg80211: don't free driver-owned scan requests

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 3rd percentile. Fixed versions are out.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • LinuxAffected: ≥ 4a58e7c38443154fce1b47910e1a9184f65c5d72, < e8c75736cfd0c6c87562cda2312e3fe5e2227955Upgrade to: e8c75736cfd0c6c87562cda2312e3fe5e2227955Affected: ≥ 4a58e7c38443154fce1b47910e1a9184f65c5d72, < cf6da29d17994865f73ca70976495ea856909c63Upgrade to: cf6da29d17994865f73ca70976495ea856909c63Affected: ≥ 4a58e7c38443154fce1b47910e1a9184f65c5d72, < dab68a74e90b8e07f08ed9deaa5884857a3cfe89Upgrade to: dab68a74e90b8e07f08ed9deaa5884857a3cfe89Stated by: CVE record

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

What it is

From the CVE record

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wifi: cfg80211: don't free driver-owned scan requests When an interface goes down while a scan is running, cfg80211 completes the scan towards userspace and frees the scan request. However, the driver can be convinced that it owns the request, since the cancellation is (intended to be) asynchronous. The WARN_ON() in the netdev notifier was meant to catch this, but it's not actually avoidable, so it triggers and we get a UAF in scan_done(). There doesn't seem to be a great way around it, so just track that the driver is still convinced it owns the request, and then just free it on completion if it was already cancelled. Also remove the warnings since they can trigger in the intended architecture.

In plain language

No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS3rd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.1% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 3rd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

3 events over 1 day, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Record updated
  2. Publishedrecord updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 7.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Linux, not every advisory.