CVE Tools

CVE-2026-98282

powerpc/iommu: Fix the overflow validation in iommu_tce_check_ioba

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 3rd percentile. Fixed versions are out.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • LinuxAffected: ≥ b1af23d836f811137d504d14d4cbdd01929dec34, < 98d8dcc4ebd10523507d4478e148809a7771a213Upgrade to: 98d8dcc4ebd10523507d4478e148809a7771a213Affected: ≥ b1af23d836f811137d504d14d4cbdd01929dec34, < 9fd9c9bbb05417f468a11fb6d145d7ff61f4a868Upgrade to: 9fd9c9bbb05417f468a11fb6d145d7ff61f4a868Affected: ≥ b1af23d836f811137d504d14d4cbdd01929dec34, < 3776bf56e06980e8a12c8c0565d9e6ac44965f03Upgrade to: 3776bf56e06980e8a12c8c0565d9e6ac44965f03Affected: ≥ b1af23d836f811137d504d14d4cbdd01929dec34, < d6a1779129d936bc1fbab80181165da544eab736Upgrade to: d6a1779129d936bc1fbab80181165da544eab736 + 4 more branchesStated by: CVE record

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

What it is

From the CVE record

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: powerpc/iommu: Fix the overflow validation in iommu_tce_check_ioba The commit b1af23d836f8 ("KVM: PPC: iommu: Unify TCE checking") unified IOBA parameter checking across KVM and VFIO into iommu_tce_check_ioba(). While doing so, the passed in argument npages is ignored and constant value '1' is used leaving out a possible overflow as the callers can legitimately be using npages > 1 for H_STUFF_TCE or H_PUT_TCE_INDIRECT cases. Fix this by accounting for 'npages', checking for arithmetic overflow, and verifying that the entire requested range (ioba - offset + npages) does not exceed the table capacity 'size'.

In plain language

No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS3rd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.1% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 3rd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

3 events over 1 day, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Record updated
  2. Publishedrecord updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Linux, not every advisory.