CVE Tools

CVE-2026-98229

xfrm: save input state data before secpath resets

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 5th percentile. Fixed versions are out.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • LinuxAffected: ≥ df3893c176e9b0bb39b28ab5ec8113fa20ad1ee0, < 35de97850987b3d022ed17df5b2577242e746dafUpgrade to: 35de97850987b3d022ed17df5b2577242e746dafAffected: ≥ df3893c176e9b0bb39b28ab5ec8113fa20ad1ee0, < 148db154066b066616b82c12d373e786eba1f96aUpgrade to: 148db154066b066616b82c12d373e786eba1f96aAffected: ≥ df3893c176e9b0bb39b28ab5ec8113fa20ad1ee0, < 537a5ae18b2be70f8eb0aca843682e81a69aab91Upgrade to: 537a5ae18b2be70f8eb0aca843682e81a69aab91Affected: ≥ df3893c176e9b0bb39b28ab5ec8113fa20ad1ee0, < 3cf5cdecd99c9c186a5ea518d93bbf3045b6e3aaUpgrade to: 3cf5cdecd99c9c186a5ea518d93bbf3045b6e3aaStated by: CVE record

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

What it is

From the CVE record

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: xfrm: save input state data before secpath resets xfrm_input() stores the current xfrm_state in the skb secpath while it continues receive-side processing. Some input paths can reset that secpath before xfrm_input() has finished dereferencing the state. Receive callback users such as VTI and XFRM interfaces can reset the secpath. The VTI receive path does so before checking whether the packet crosses network namespaces, while the XFRM interface path does so only for cross-network-namespace packets. The XFRM_MAX_DEPTH error path can also reset the secpath before the final drop callback reports the current state's protocol. If secpath_reset() drops the last state reference while the state is concurrently deleted, xfrm_input() can still dereference the freed state when selecting transport_finish() or reporting the drop callback protocol. Save the state protocol on the stack while the state is still valid, and use the already saved address family for transport_finish(). A larval XFRM_STATE_ACQ state has no type, so retain nexthdr as its protocol. This preserves the existing drop-path fallback while avoiding the post-reset state dereferences without adding an extra state reference to every received packet.

In plain language

No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS5th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.2% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 5th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

3 events over 1 day, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Record updated
  2. Publishedrecord updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 7.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Linux, not every advisory.