CVE Tools

CVE-2026-79610

grant-table: double version change race

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 1st percentile. Only a workaround so far.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

No fixed build is published yet. The vendor describes a workaround.

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Ask whoever manages your servers whether they run Xen as a virtualization platform (common at hosting providers and some cloud/VPS setups).
  2. If yes, ask your hosting provider or IT team to check Xen's security advisories for a fix to this specific issue (XSA advisory covering grant table version-switch races).
  3. There is no fixed version published yet — ask your provider to apply any interim mitigation Xen's security team releases and to watch for an official patch.
  4. Once a patch is released, schedule an update of the Xen hypervisor as soon as possible, since this affects the host and everything running on it.

What it is

From the CVE record

XSA-501 was about issues with v1 -> v2 and v2 -> v1 changes racing certain other grant table operations. Sadly a v2 -> v1 -> v2 change has yet another effect which wasn't accounted for: During the first change, status pages would be freed. During the second change they would be allocated again. Hence across the full pair of change the addresses of the status pages may change, rendering stale previously calculated pointers into the status array.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

This is a flaw in Xen (virtualization software used to run multiple virtual servers on one machine) that lets someone who already has basic access to a virtual machine crash or potentially take over the host — and there is no fix available yet, so if you run Xen-based virtual servers you should treat this as urgent.

A time-of-check/time-of-use race in Xen's grant table version-switching logic (v2→v1→v2) frees and reallocates status pages, leaving stale pointers that a local, low-privileged guest/user can exploit for memory corruption and full compromise of confidentiality, integrity and availability (CWE-362).

If you're affected

  • Virtual machine host takeover
  • Cross-tenant data exposure
  • Service crash/outage
  • Compromise of other hosted VMs

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS1st
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.1% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 1st percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Attention now

Rising, driven by in-the-wild reports.

Lifecycle

11 events over 9 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. OpenVAS check added
  2. Workaround availablerecord updated
  3. Workaround availablerecord updated
  4. Workaround availableworkaround available, published, weakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector LocalRequires local access to the vulnerable system (e.g. local login, malicious file)
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Xen, not every advisory.