CVE Tools

CVE-2026-32746

Exploitation likely. EPSS gives it a 45% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. A vendor fix is available.

Check it yourself

OpenVAS · 12 checks

e.g. OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.119282

Run the check

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD, BDU

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

  • GNU inetutilsAffected: ≤ 2.7Upgrade to: after 2.7Stated by: CVE record
  • ООО «РусБИТех-Астра» Astra Linux Special EditionAffected: 1.8Upgrade to: not statedStated by: BDU
  • Free Software Foundation, Inc. InetutilsAffected: до 2.7 включительноUpgrade to: not statedStated by: BDU

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your systems run telnetd from GNU inetutils (version 2.7 or earlier), including Astra Linux installations — ask your IT provider if unsure.
  2. If telnet access is not actively needed, disable the telnetd service entirely; telnet is largely obsolete and this removes the risk completely.
  3. If telnet must stay on, apply the vendor fix referenced in the GNU inetutils bug tracker (lists.gnu.org, March 2026 patch thread) as soon as it's available for your distribution.
  4. Until patched, block inbound access to the telnet port (23) from the internet and restrict it to trusted internal networks only.

What it is

From the CVE record

telnetd in GNU inetutils through 2.7 allows an out-of-bounds write in the LINEMODE SLC (Set Local Characters) suboption handler because add_slc does not check whether the buffer is full.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

A serious bug in the telnet remote-login server (used in inetutils, which some Linux systems including Astra Linux include) could let an attacker crash or take over the service if it's running on your network — most modern businesses don't use telnet anymore, but if you do, this needs attention soon.

GNU inetutils telnetd is vulnerable to an unauthenticated remote out-of-bounds write in the LINEMODE SLC suboption handler (add_slc fails to check buffer bounds), enabling memory corruption and potential remote code execution with no authentication or user interaction.

If you're affected

  • Full server takeover
  • Service crash/outage
  • Unauthorized remote access
  • Lateral movement into network

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS99th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

45% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 99th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

13 events over 226 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. EPSS band changelow → moderateepss band change
  2. EPSS band changemoderate → low
  3. EPSS band changemoderate → low
  4. EPSS band changemoderate → 0epss band change
  5. OpenVAS check added
  6. EPSS band changelow → moderate

Affected products

And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Inetutils, not every advisory.