CVE Tools

CVE-2026-22778

vLLM leaks a heap address when PIL throws an error

Exploitation likely. EPSS gives it a 17% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Fixed in 0.14.1.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD, GitHub

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • Vllm-project VllmAffected: >= 0.8.3, < 0.14.1Upgrade to: not statedStated by: CVE record
  • PyPI vllmAffected: ≥ 0.8.3, < 0.14.1Upgrade to: 0.14.1Stated by: GitHub advisory

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check if you are running vLLM between version 0.8.3 and 0.14.0, especially with image/multimodal features enabled.
  2. Confirm whether the vLLM API endpoint is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks.
  3. Upgrade vLLM to version 0.14.1 or later.
  4. If you cannot upgrade immediately, restrict access to the multimodal/image endpoint to trusted internal networks only.
  5. After upgrading, verify error responses no longer include memory address details when sending test malformed images.

What it is

From the CVE record

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). From 0.8.3 to before 0.14.1, when an invalid image is sent to vLLM's multimodal endpoint, PIL throws an error. vLLM returns this error to the client, leaking a heap address. With this leak, we reduce ASLR from 4 billion guesses to ~8 guesses. This vulnerability can be chained a heap overflow with JPEG2000 decoder in OpenCV/FFmpeg to achieve remote code execution. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.14.1.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

If you run vLLM (versions 0.8.3 to 0.14.0) to serve AI models that accept images, a bad actor can trick it into leaking a hidden server memory address just by sending a broken image — this is a stepping stone toward a full server takeover, so you should update to 0.14.1 or later soon.

Unauthenticated information disclosure in vLLM's multimodal endpoint — malformed images trigger a PIL error that reflects a heap address to the client, defeating ASLR and enabling chaining with a separate JPEG2000 decoder heap overflow for remote code execution.

If you're affected

  • Full server takeover risk
  • AI service downtime
  • Stepping stone to remote code execution
  • Exposure of internal model infrastructure

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS97th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

17% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 97th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

10 events over 240 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. EPSS band changelow → moderateepss band change
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. Patch availablerecord updated
  4. Nuclei check added
  5. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Vllm, not every advisory.