CVE Tools

CVE-2025-12106

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 46th percentile. A vendor fix is available.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD, BDU

What to do

The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.

  • OpenVPNAffected: ≥ 2.7_alpha1, ≤ 2.7_rc1Upgrade to: after 2.7_rc1Stated by: CVE record
  • Сообщество свободного программного обеспечения Debian GNU/LinuxAffected: 11Upgrade to: not statedStated by: BDU

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether your OpenVPN is running in the affected range (OpenVPN versions 2.7_alpha1 through 2.7_rc1).
  2. If it is affected, plan an upgrade immediately to the OpenVPN version that fixes CVE-2025-12106 from the trusted OpenVPN security notice.
  3. After upgrading, restart OpenVPN and confirm the service is running normally.
  4. Until you finish upgrading, restrict access to the OpenVPN server so only intended users/networks can reach it (reduce “reachable in default config” exposure).

What it is

From the CVE record

Insufficient argument validation in OpenVPN 2.7_alpha1 through 2.7_rc1 allows an attacker to trigger a heap buffer over-read when parsing IP addresses

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

This OpenVPN bug lets a remote attacker crash OpenVPN or potentially read sensitive data by sending specially crafted IP address input; if you run OpenVPN 2.7_alpha1 through 2.7_rc1, you should act.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a heap buffer over-read in OpenVPN 2.7_alpha1 through 2.7_rc1 when parsing IP address arguments, leading to potential process memory disclosure and/or a denial of service.

If you're affected

  • Service disruption (VPN downtime)
  • Sensitive memory data exposure
  • Remote crash leading to outage
  • Increased incident response costs

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS46th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.6% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 46th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

6 events over 299 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. Publishedweakness classified

Affected products

And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Scored 9.1 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Debian GNU/Linux, not every advisory.