CVE-2021-22175
Exploited in the wild. In CISA KEV since 2026‑02‑18. A vendor fix is available.
What to do
The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.
- GitLabAffected: >=10.5, <13.6.7Upgrade to: not statedAffected: >=13.7, <13.7.7Upgrade to: not statedAffected: >=13.8, <13.8.4Upgrade to: not statedStated by: CVE record
- Сообщество свободного программного обеспечения Debian GNU/LinuxAffected: 9Upgrade to: not statedStated by: BDU
Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in
Steps
Written by AI from the record- Check whether this GitLab feature is enabled: “requests to the internal network for webhooks” (the setting must be explicitly turned on).
- Check your GitLab version; if it’s any version starting from 10.5, treat it as potentially affected.
- Upgrade GitLab to a fixed release: update to 13.6.7 or later as directed by your GitLab support/upgrade path.
- If you cannot upgrade quickly, disable the internal-webhook internal-network request feature immediately and follow GitLab’s mitigation instructions.
Coverage timeline
1 publisherExploitation reported in the wild
Added to CISA KEV catalog
Sourced from public security reporting — each date is when it was published, not when it happened. 2 further articles named this CVE in wider roundups without reporting it as a distinct event.
What it is
From the CVE record
When requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, a server-side request forgery vulnerability in GitLab affecting all versions starting from 10.5 was possible to exploit for an unauthenticated attacker even on a GitLab instance where registration is disabled
In plain language
Written by AI from the recordCVE-2021-22175 is a GitLab flaw that lets an outside visitor trick your GitLab server into calling hidden internal systems when “internal webhooks” are turned on; if your GitLab is exposed and that setting is enabled, you should act now.
Unauthenticated server-side request forgery (SSRF) in GitLab (CWE-918) can be triggered by any network visitor when requests to the internal network for webhooks are enabled, allowing the attacker to force GitLab to make unauthorized calls to private internal services.
If you're affected
- Internal system probing
- Unauthorized internal requests
- Possible data exposure
- Operational disruption
Exploitation
Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.
- CISA KEV
Listed as exploited in the wild since 2026-02-18.
US federal agencies must remediate by 2026-03-11.
Apply mitigations per vendor instructions, follow applicable BOD 22-01 guidance for cloud services, or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.
- Public exploits
No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.
- EPSS
53% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 99th percentile of scored CVEs.
Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.
Lifecycle
11 events over 1938 days, from the signal feeds we watch.
- Patch availablerecord updated
- Analysis publishedGitLab's New Path-Traversal Bug Scored a 10.0. Attackers Found It Before CISA Did.
- OpenVAS check added
- Nuclei check added
- Patch availablerecord updated
- Added to CISA KEV
Affected products
Technical detail
CVSS 3.1 vector
Open in the CVSS calculatorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Scored 6.8 by NVD.
How it is reached
- Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
- Attack Complexity HighRequires specific conditions like a race condition or non-default configuration
- Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
- User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation
Scope
- Scope ChangedThe exploit can affect other components (e.g. sandbox escape, host compromise from VM)
Impact if exploited
- Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
- Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
- Availability NoneNo availability impact
Weaknesses
ATT&CK techniques
Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.
- Command and ControlT1090Proxyhigh confidence
- Initial AccessT1190Exploit Public-Facing Applicationmedium confidence
Sources
References in the record
- gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/294178
- hackerone.com/reports/1059596
- gitlab.com/gitlab-org/cves/-/blob/master/2021/CVE-2021-22175.json
And 5 more references. See all after sign-in
Analysis on the cve.tools blog
In the news
Watch the software you run.
My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next exploited one reaches you without reading every advisory.
We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for GitLab, not every advisory. This one: actively exploited.
A free account adds
- The full version matrix and every affected product
- Exploit links, proofs of concept and Metasploit modules
- Email alerts for the products you watch
- The same data over REST API, MCP and CLI