CVE Tools

CVE-2026-95107

Module object allocation size overflow corrupts the manager object pool

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 4th percentile. Fixed in 6.5.2.202603.

Check it yourself

No ready-made check. Neither Nuclei nor OpenVAS has one for this CVE yet.

Request a scan

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • Eclipse Foundation Eclipse ThreadXAffected: ≥ 6.0.1, ≤ 6.5.1.202602aUpgrade to: after 6.5.1.202602aFixed builds6.5.2.202603Stated by: CVE record

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

What it is

From the CVE record

A ThreadX module chooses `object_size` when it calls `txm_module_object_allocate`. The Module Manager adds its own 16-byte private header to that size and asked the object pool for the result **without checking the addition**. A size near the top of a `ULONG` wrapped, the pool served a block far smaller than the header, and the manager then wrote the header past the end of it and into the neighbouring byte-pool block.

In plain language

No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS4th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.2% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 4th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

4 events over 0 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Eclipse ThreadX, not every advisory.