CVE Tools

CVE-2026-93680

Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 82nd percentile. Fixed in 1.13.0.

Check it yourself

No ready-made check. Neither Nuclei nor OpenVAS has one for this CVE yet.

Request a scan

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • IBM Langflow OSSAffected: ≥ 1.0.0, ≤ 1.12.8Upgrade to: after 1.12.8Stated by: CVE record
  • LangflowAffected: ≥ 1.0.0, < 1.13.0Upgrade to: 1.13.0Stated by: NVD

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check which version of Langflow OSS you are running — anything from 1.0.0 to 1.12.8 is affected.
  2. If you installed via pip, run: pip install langflow --upgrade.
  3. If you run it via Docker, pull and redeploy the latest image tagged 1.13.0 or later.
  4. Confirm the upgrade succeeded by checking the running version is 1.13.0 or newer.
  5. In the meantime, make sure your Langflow instance is not exposed directly to the public internet.
pip install langflow --upgrade

What it is

From the CVE record

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

Langflow OSS, a tool for building AI workflows, has a flaw that lets an attacker bypass login checks entirely — if you run an older version (before 1.13.0) that's reachable online, you should update soon, though no active attacks are known yet.

CWE-287 improper authentication in Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0–1.12.8 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass access controls, likely by exploiting a flaw in session or credential validation logic that fails to properly verify identity before granting access.

If you're affected

  • Full application takeover
  • Unauthorized access to AI workflows
  • Exposure of connected data sources
  • Operational disruption

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS82nd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

2.2% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 82nd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

12 events over 1 day, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablepatch available, patch available, record updated, record updated, record updated
  2. Patch availablepatch available, published, weakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 9.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Langflow OSS, not every advisory.