CVE Tools

CVE-2026-92853

Out-of-bounds Read via a Zero-length TLS 1.3 Certificate Message in NetX Secure

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 22nd percentile. Fixed in 6.5.2.202603.

Check it yourself

No ready-made check. Neither Nuclei nor OpenVAS has one for this CVE yet.

Request a scan

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • Eclipse Foundation Eclipse ThreadX - NetX DuoAffected: ≤ 6.5.1.202602Upgrade to: after 6.5.1.202602Fixed builds6.5.2.202603Stated by: CVE record

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

What it is

From the CVE record

The TLS 1.3 Certificate-message parser in NetX Secure decrements the message length to skip a context byte without first establishing that the message has a byte to skip. A zero-length Certificate message therefore wraps the unsigned length to `0xFFFFFFFF`, which makes the bounds check that follows vacuous and sends the parser reading past the session packet buffer. The trigger is a four-byte handshake header and requires no cryptographic validity. It is reachable pre-authentication.

In plain language

No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS22nd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.3% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 22nd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

4 events over 0 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Eclipse Foundation, not every advisory.