CVE-2026-92360
ag-ui-protocol ag-ui Event Application Layer agent.ts prepareRunAgentInput origin validation
No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 11th percentile. No fix published yet.
No public exploit knownFixNone yetNo fix or workaround published
No ready-made check. Neither Nuclei nor OpenVAS has one for this CVE yet.
What to do
No fixed build or workaround is published yet. Limit exposure and watch for a patch.
- Ag-ui-protocol Ag-uiAffected: 1.0Upgrade to: not statedStated by: CVE record
Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in
What it is
From the CVE record
A weakness has been identified in ag-ui-protocol ag-ui 1.0. The impacted element is the function prepareRunAgentInput of the file agent/agent.ts of the component Event Application Layer. This manipulation of the argument TEXT_MESSAGE_START causes origin validation error. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The pull request to fix this issue awaits acceptance.
In plain language
No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.
Exploitation
Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.
- CISA KEV
Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.
- Public exploits
No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.
- EPSS
0.2% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 11th percentile of scored CVEs.
Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.
Lifecycle
7 events over 7 days, from the signal feeds we watch.
- Record updated
- Record updated
- Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated, record updated
Affected products
Technical detail
CVSS 3.1 vector
Open in the CVSS calculatorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Scored 6.3 by NVD.
How it is reached
- Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
- Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
- Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
- User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation
Scope
- Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself
Impact if exploited
- Confidentiality LowSome restricted information is disclosed, but limited in scope
- Integrity LowData modification is possible but limited in scope or consequence
- Availability LowReduced performance or intermittent disruption of service
Weaknesses
ATT&CK techniques
Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.
Sources
References in the record
- github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/
- github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/issues/2437
- github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/pull/2701
And 4 more references. See all after sign-in
Watch the software you run.
My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.
We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Ag-ui, not every advisory.
A free account adds
- The full version matrix and every affected product
- Exploit links, proofs of concept and Metasploit modules
- Email alerts for the products you watch
- The same data over REST API, MCP and CLI