CVE-2026-92184
ag-ui-protocol ag-ui Multimodal Content utils.py urllib.request.urlopen server-side request forgery
No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 31st percentile. No fix published yet.
No public exploit knownFixNone yetNo fix or workaround published
No ready-made check. Neither Nuclei nor OpenVAS has one for this CVE yet.
What to do
No fixed build or workaround is published yet. Limit exposure and watch for a patch.
- Ag-ui-protocol Ag-uiAffected: 0.3.0Upgrade to: not statedStated by: CVE record
Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in
What it is
From the CVE record
A security flaw has been discovered in ag-ui-protocol ag-ui 0.3.0. Affected is the function urllib.request.urlopen of the file integrations/aws-strands/python/src/ag_ui_strands/utils.py of the component Multimodal Content. The manipulation of the argument Value results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The patch is identified as bf0c34df34cbb4b1992bc37c9bfffe6dd54bb189. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.
In plain language
No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.
Exploitation
Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.
- CISA KEV
Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.
- Public exploits
No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.
- EPSS
0.4% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 31st percentile of scored CVEs.
Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.
Lifecycle
6 events over 2 days, from the signal feeds we watch.
- Record updated
- Record updatedrecord updated
- Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped
Affected products
Technical detail
CVSS 3.1 vector
Open in the CVSS calculatorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Scored 6.3 by NVD.
How it is reached
- Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
- Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
- Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
- User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation
Scope
- Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself
Impact if exploited
- Confidentiality LowSome restricted information is disclosed, but limited in scope
- Integrity LowData modification is possible but limited in scope or consequence
- Availability LowReduced performance or intermittent disruption of service
Weaknesses
ATT&CK techniques
Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.
- Command and ControlT1090Proxyhigh confidence
- Initial AccessT1190Exploit Public-Facing Applicationmedium confidence
Sources
References in the record
- github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/
- github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/commit/bf0c34df34cbb4b1992bc37c9bfffe6dd54bb189
- github.com/ag-ui-protocol/ag-ui/issues/2432
And 5 more references. See all after sign-in
Watch the software you run.
My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.
We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Ag-ui, not every advisory.
A free account adds
- The full version matrix and every affected product
- Exploit links, proofs of concept and Metasploit modules
- Email alerts for the products you watch
- The same data over REST API, MCP and CLI