CVE-2026-67278
TLS server impersonation possible in Mikrotik RouterOS
No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 18th percentile. Fixed versions are out.
No public exploit knownFix1 product2 fixed builds listed below
e.g. OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.119494
What to do
Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.
- Mikrotik RouterOSAffected: ≥ 7.24, < 7.24.3Upgrade to: 7.24.3Affected: ≥ 7.0.0, < 7.23.6Upgrade to: 7.23.6Stated by: CVE record
Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in
Steps
Written by AI from the record- Check which RouterOS version your router is running from the device's system menu or WinBox/WebFig dashboard.
- If you are on any 7.x version before 7.23.6 or 7.24.3, plan an upgrade right away.
- Upgrade to RouterOS 7.23.6 (Long-term branch) or 7.24.3 (Stable branch) — note that 7.23.4 and 7.24.2 only partially fixed this, so those are not safe stopping points.
- Review Mikrotik's advisory page for your specific hardware model before upgrading to avoid compatibility issues.
- After upgrading, confirm the new version is active and re-check any automated update scripts for the same version pinning issue.
What it is
From the CVE record
MikroTik RouterOS accepts malformed RSA/PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures across RSA-based services, including TLS/X.509 certificate validation and SSH host-key authentication. Because its trust store includes an e=3 root CA, an attacker controlling or redirecting an outbound RouterOS TLS connection can use the root’s public certificate - without its private key - to forge a trusted intermediate and issue certificates for arbitrary hostnames, enabling TLS server impersonation. The same permissive verification also undermines RSA-based SSH authentication. This issue affects only 7.x branch was fixed in versions: 7.23.6 (Long-term) and 7.24.3 (Stable). Releases 7.23.4 and 7.24.2 included an incomplete fix.
In plain language
Written by AI from the recordA flaw in Mikrotik routers lets an attacker trick the router into trusting a fake secure website or server, so you should update to the fixed version as soon as possible.
RouterOS improperly validates RSA/PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures and trusts a root CA that permits signature forgery without the private key, allowing unauthenticated TLS/X.509 and SSH host-key impersonation on outbound connections (CWE-347).
If you're affected
- Traffic interception on router connections
- Credential theft via fake servers
- SSH session hijacking risk
- Loss of trust in secure updates
Exploitation
Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.
- CISA KEV
Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.
- Public exploits
No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.
- EPSS
0.3% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 18th percentile of scored CVEs.
Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.
Lifecycle
12 events over 20 days, from the signal feeds we watch.
- Patch availableworkaround available, record updated
- Record updated
- Record updatedrecord updated
- Record updated
- OpenVAS check addedpublished, weakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated
Affected products
And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in
Technical detail
CVSS 3.1 vector
Open in the CVSS calculatorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Scored 9.1 by NVD.
How it is reached
- Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
- Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
- Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
- User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation
Scope
- Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself
Impact if exploited
- Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
- Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
- Availability NoneNo availability impact
Weaknesses
ATT&CK techniques
Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.
Sources
References in the record
- cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/mikrotik-routeros-cve
- cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/vulnerabilities-in-mikrotik-routeros-actively-exploited/
- forum.mikrotik.com/t/7-23-6-long-term-is-released/273139
And 3 more references. See all after sign-in
Analysis on the cve.tools blog
In the news
Watch the software you run.
My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.
We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for RouterOS, not every advisory.
A free account adds
- The full version matrix and every affected product
- Exploit links, proofs of concept and Metasploit modules
- Email alerts for the products you watch
- The same data over REST API, MCP and CLI