CVE Tools

CVE-2026-15307

Server-side file-write and request forgery via spatial lookups

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 67th percentile. Fixed versions are out.

Check it yourself

OpenVAS · 15 checks

e.g. OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.139168

Run the check

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • djangoproject DjangoAffected: ≥ 6.0, < 6.0.8Upgrade to: 6.0.8Affected: ≥ 5.2, < 5.2.17Upgrade to: 5.2.17Stated by: CVE record

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

What it is

From the CVE record

An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor's `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Bence Nagy, localhost-detect, and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.

In plain language

No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS67th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

1.1% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 67th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

13 events over 81 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. Patch availablerecord updated
  4. Record updated
  5. OpenVAS check added
  6. Record updated

Affected products

And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in

Scale

How widely the affected products are used. This is not a count of vulnerable hosts.

Estimate Public sources, each figure dated. How much of it is already patched is not known.

Django

Library
  • 41.1Mdownloads / month

    PyPI downloads, last 30 days (pypistats, mirrors excluded).

    PyPI ↗ · as of 2 Nov 2026 · High confidence

Version split: unknown. No public source for this product.

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.8 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Django, not every advisory.