Django
Library41.1Mdownloads / month
PyPI downloads, last 30 days (pypistats, mirrors excluded).
PyPI ↗ · as of 2 Nov 2026 · High confidence
Version split: unknown. No public source for this product.
Server-side file-write and request forgery via spatial lookups
No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 67th percentile. Fixed versions are out.
e.g. OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.139168
Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.
Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor's `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Bence Nagy, localhost-detect, and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.
No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.
Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.
Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.
No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.
1.1% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 67th percentile of scored CVEs.
Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.
13 events over 81 days, from the signal feeds we watch.
And 1 more affected product. See all after sign-in
How widely the affected products are used. This is not a count of vulnerable hosts.
Estimate Public sources, each figure dated. How much of it is already patched is not known.
41.1Mdownloads / month
PyPI downloads, last 30 days (pypistats, mirrors excluded).
PyPI ↗ · as of 2 Nov 2026 · High confidence
Version split: unknown. No public source for this product.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Scored 8.8 by NVD.
Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.
And 4 more references. See all after sign-in
My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.
We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Django, not every advisory.