CVE Tools

CVE-2026-15176

NGINX ngx_http_core_module vulnerability

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 43rd percentile. Fixed versions are out.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • F5 NGINX PlusAffected: ≥ 37.1.0, < 37.1.0.1Upgrade to: 37.1.0.1Affected: ≥ 37.0.0, < 37.0.5.1Upgrade to: 37.0.5.1Affected: R36Upgrade to: not statedAffected: R35Upgrade to: not stated + 2 more branchesStated by: CVE record
  • F5 NGINX Open SourceAffected: ≥ 1.31.0, < 1.31.7Upgrade to: 1.31.7Affected: ≥ 0.1.29, < 1.30.6Upgrade to: 1.30.6Stated by: CVE record

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Ask your web/IT team to check your nginx or NGINX Plus configuration files for use of the alias directive combined with rewrite, set, or return referencing $request_filename, or an access log format using $request_filename.
  2. If found, upgrade nginx to version 1.31.7 or 1.30.6, or NGINX Plus to 37.1.0.1 or 37.0.5.1, depending on your branch.
  3. If you cannot upgrade immediately, remove the risky combination by avoiding alias in that location block or removing $request_filename from logging/rewrite rules.
  4. Confirm with your provider that Address Space Layout Randomization (a system-level memory protection) is enabled on the server, since disabling it increases the risk of attackers running code.

Coverage timeline

2 publishers
  1. Vendor patch released

    ·BleepingComputer summary

Sourced from public security reporting — each date is when it was published, not when it happened. 2 further articles named this CVE in wider roundups without reporting it as a distinct event.

What it is

From the CVE record

A vulnerability exists in NGINX Plus and NGINX Open Source when a location is configured that uses the alias directive together with rewrite and a set or return directive referencing the $request_filename variable. Alternatively, the same result could be achieved when the $request_filename variable is used in an access log format directive. An unauthenticated attacker along with conditions beyond their control can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP requests. This may cause a heap buffer overflow in the NGINX worker process leading to a restart. Additionally, attackers can execute code on systems with Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) disabled or when the attacker can bypass ASLR. Impact: This vulnerability may allow remote attackers to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) on the NGINX system or to possibly trigger a code execution. There is no control plane exposure; this is a data plane issue only. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

A flaw in the NGINX web server software can let an outside attacker crash it or, in weaker setups, potentially take control of the server, but this only applies if your NGINX configuration uses a specific combination of settings — check with whoever manages your website server and update to the fixed version.

Unauthenticated remote attackers can trigger a heap buffer overflow in nginx's ngx_http_core_module by sending crafted HTTP requests to configurations combining the `alias` directive with `rewrite`/`set`/`return` or access-log formatting that reference `$request_filename`, causing worker-process crashes and potential code execution on ASLR-weak systems.

If you're affected

  • Website/service outage
  • Full server takeover (weak ASLR)
  • Operational disruption
  • Data exposure if RCE succeeds

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS43rd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.5% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 43rd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Attention now

Sustained, driven by in-the-wild reports.

Lifecycle

10 events over 8 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. OpenVAS check added
  2. Workaround availablerecord updated
  3. Workaround availableworkaround available, published, weakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Scored 8.1 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity HighRequires specific conditions like a race condition or non-default configuration
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for NGINX Plus, not every advisory.