CVE Tools

CVE-2026-110192

Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 16th percentile. Fixed in 1.13.0.

Check it yourself

No ready-made check. Neither Nuclei nor OpenVAS has one for this CVE yet.

Request a scan

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • IBM Langflow OSSAffected: ≥ 1.0.0, ≤ 1.12.8Upgrade to: after 1.12.8Stated by: CVE record
  • LangflowAffected: ≥ 1.0.0, < 1.13.0Upgrade to: 1.13.0Stated by: NVD

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether you're running Langflow OSS version 1.0.0 through 1.12.8.
  2. If deployed via pip, run: pip install langflow --upgrade.
  3. If deployed via Docker, pull the updated image for version 1.13.0 or later.
  4. Confirm the upgrade by checking the running version matches 1.13.0 or newer.
  5. Review who has user accounts on your Langflow instance, since this issue requires a valid login to exploit.
pip install langflow --upgrade

What it is

From the CVE record

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

If you run Langflow OSS for building AI workflows, a logged-in user could see credentials they shouldn't — update to version 1.13.0 when convenient, but there's no sign anyone is exploiting this.

CWE-522 (insufficiently protected credentials) in Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0–1.12.8 allows a remote authenticated, low-privilege user to retrieve sensitive credential data without impacting integrity or availability.

If you're affected

  • Credential/secrets exposure
  • Internal data leakage
  • Insider-access abuse risk

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS16th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.2% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 16th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

10 events over 6 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated
  3. Patch availablepatch available, published, weakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Scored 6.5 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required LowRequires basic user-level privileges
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability NoneNo availability impact

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Langflow OSS, not every advisory.