CVE Tools

CVE-2026-102103

Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway server-side request forgery

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 52nd percentile. Fixed in 9.5.0.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD, CSAF

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • Kiteworks Email Protection GatewayAffected: < 9.5.0Upgrade to: 9.5.0Stated by: CVE record
  • Accellion KiteworksAffected: < 9.5.0Upgrade to: 9.5.0Stated by: NVD

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

Steps

Written by AI from the record
  1. Check whether you run Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway and confirm the version in use.
  2. If your version is below 9.5.0, treat this as an active risk and plan an immediate upgrade.
  3. Upgrade to version 9.5.0 or later (9.5.1 is also confirmed fixed).
  4. After upgrading, verify the gateway is processing mail normally and confirm the version number again.
  5. Ask your vendor or IT provider to confirm the patch has been applied, especially if the gateway handles mail for sensitive departments.

What it is

From the CVE record

Fixed in version 9.5.0 and 9.5.1.

In plain language

Written by AI from the record

A critical flaw lets outside attackers make your email security gateway send hidden requests into your private network just by sending it an email, with no login needed — if you run Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway, you should treat this as urgent.

Unauthenticated SSRF in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway (CWE-918) triggered during certificate revocation list retrieval while processing inbound mail, allowing attackers to force the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal network destinations.

If you're affected

  • Internal network reconnaissance
  • Sensitive internal data exposure
  • Email gateway disruption
  • Access to internal services

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS52nd
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.7% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 52nd percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

9 events over 8 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availablerecord updated
  2. Patch availablerecord updated, record updated
  3. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped, record updated

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Scored 9.1 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality HighTotal information disclosure — all data in the component is compromised
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Email Protection Gateway, not every advisory.