CVE Tools

CVE-2026-0288

PAN-OS: Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in User-ID Terminal Server Agent

No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 57th percentile. Fixed versions are out.

Published Updated Sources: CVE.org, NVD

What to do

Find your product and version, then upgrade to the build on the right.

  • Palo Alto Networks Cloud NGFWFixed buildsAllStated by: CVE record
  • Palo Alto Networks PAN-OSAffected: ≥ 12.1.0, < 12.1.8Upgrade to: 12.1.8Affected: ≥ 11.2.0, < 11.2.13Upgrade to: 11.2.13Affected: ≥ 11.1.0, < 11.1.16Upgrade to: 11.1.16Affected: ≥ 10.2.0, < 10.2.7-h36Upgrade to: 10.2.7-h36Stated by: CVE record
  • Palo Alto Networks Prisma AccessAffected: ≥ 11.2.0, < 11.2.7-h18Upgrade to: 11.2.7-h18Affected: ≥ 10.2.0, < 10.2.10-h39Upgrade to: 10.2.10-h39Stated by: CVE record
  • Paloaltonetworks Pan-osAffected: ≥ 10.2.0, < 10.2.7Upgrade to: 10.2.7Stated by: NVD

Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in

What it is

From the CVE record

Multiple buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the User-ID Terminal Server Agent (TSA) component of Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS software allow an unauthenticated attacker with network access to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition or potentially execute arbitrary code by sending specially crafted network traffic. The security risk posed by this issue is minimized when the User-ID Terminal Server Agent connectivity is restricted to only trusted internal IP addresses according to our recommended best practice deployment guidelines https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/ngfw/help/10-2/user-identification/device-user-identification-terminal-services-agents#:~:text=To%20minimize%20security%20risk%2C%20restrict%20TS%20Agent%20connectivity%20to%20trusted%20internal%20IP%20addresses%20only. . Panorama is not impacted by this vulnerability.

In plain language

No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.

Exploitation

Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.

EPSS57th
CISA KEV

Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.

Public exploits

No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.

EPSS

0.8% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 57th percentile of scored CVEs.

Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.

Lifecycle

13 events over 34 days, from the signal feeds we watch.

  1. Patch availableworkaround available, record updated
  2. OpenVAS check added
  3. Patch availableworkaround available, record updated
  4. Patch availableworkaround available, record updated
  5. Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped

Affected products

Technical detail

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Scored 7.5 by NVD.

How it is reached

  • Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
  • Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
  • Privileges Required NoneNo authentication required — anyone can exploit this
  • User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation

Scope

  • Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself

Impact if exploited

  • Confidentiality NoneNo confidentiality impact
  • Integrity NoneNo integrity impact
  • Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable

Weaknesses

ATT&CK techniques

Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.

Sources

Watch the software you run.

My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.

We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for Cloud NGFW, not every advisory.