CVE-2025-22258
A heap-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiSRA 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, FortiPAM 1.5.0, 1.4.0 through 1.4.2, 1.3.0 through 1.3.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiProxy 7...
No known exploitation. EPSS puts it in the 47th percentile. A vendor fix is available.
No public exploit knownFixVendor fixNo build named by the sources
e.g. OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.155630
What to do
The vendor has published a fix. Version details are below where the sources state them.
- Fortinet FortiPAMAffected: 1.5.0Upgrade to: not statedAffected: ≥ 1.4.0, ≤ 1.4.2Upgrade to: after 1.4.2Affected: ≥ 1.3.0, ≤ 1.3.1Upgrade to: after 1.3.1Affected: 1.2.0Upgrade to: not stated + 2 more branchesStated by: CVE record
- Fortinet FortiOSAffected: ≥ 7.6.0, ≤ 7.6.2Upgrade to: after 7.6.2Affected: ≥ 7.4.0, ≤ 7.4.6Upgrade to: after 7.4.6Affected: ≥ 7.2.0, ≤ 7.2.10Upgrade to: after 7.2.10Affected: ≥ 7.0.2, ≤ 7.0.16Upgrade to: after 7.0.16Stated by: CVE record
- Fortinet FortiSRAAffected: 1.5.0Upgrade to: not statedAffected: ≥ 1.4.0, ≤ 1.4.2Upgrade to: after 1.4.2Stated by: CVE record
- Fortinet FortiProxyAffected: ≥ 7.6.0, ≤ 7.6.1Upgrade to: after 7.6.1Affected: ≥ 7.4.0, ≤ 7.4.7Upgrade to: after 7.4.7Stated by: CVE record
- Fortinet FortiSwitchManagerAffected: ≥ 7.2.1, ≤ 7.2.5Upgrade to: after 7.2.5Stated by: CVE record
Versions as the sources state them. Full version matrix after sign-in
What it is
From the CVE record
Fortinet has published information on vulnerabilities in FortiOS. This advisory lists the related Siemens Industrial products. Siemens has released a new version for RUGGEDCOM APE1808 and recommends to update to the latest version.
In plain language
No plain-language summary for this CVE yet.
Exploitation
Where each signal puts this CVE on the scale from published to confirmed exploited.
- CISA KEV
Not in the catalog. CISA has not confirmed exploitation.
- Public exploits
No public exploit or proof of concept found in the sources we track.
- EPSS
0.6% chance of exploitation activity in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the 47th percentile of scored CVEs.
Exploit Prediction Scoring System, FIRST.org. A probability, not a confirmation.
Lifecycle
8 events over 369 days, from the signal feeds we watch.
- Patch availablerecord updated
- OpenVAS check added
- Patch availablerecord updated
- Publishedweakness classified, att&ck mapped
Affected products
And 5 more affected products. See all after sign-in
Technical detail
CVSS 3.1 vector
Open in the CVSS calculatorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Scored 6.5 by NVD.
How it is reached
- Attack Vector NetworkExploitable remotely over the network without any special conditions
- Attack Complexity LowNo special conditions — the attack can be reliably reproduced
- Privileges Required HighRequires admin or elevated privileges
- User Interaction NoneNo user interaction needed — fully automated exploitation
Scope
- Scope UnchangedImpact is limited to the vulnerable component itself
Impact if exploited
- Confidentiality NoneNo confidentiality impact
- Integrity HighTotal loss of integrity — attacker can modify any data in the component
- Availability HighTotal denial of service — the component is completely unavailable
Weaknesses
ATT&CK techniques
Mapped from the weaknesses above (CWE to ATT&CK), not observed in attacks.
- Privilege EscalationT1068Exploitation for Privilege Escalationhigh confidence
Sources
Watch the software you run.
My Stack ranks new CVEs for your products by real-world exploitation, so the next serious one reaches you without reading every advisory.
We'll flag the next CVE, public exploit or patch for FortiPAM, not every advisory.
A free account adds
- The full version matrix and every affected product
- Exploit links, proofs of concept and Metasploit modules
- Email alerts for the products you watch
- The same data over REST API, MCP and CLI